The strangest man by graham farmelo6/9/2023 ![]() ![]() ![]() Unable to pay the lawyer a second time, McKoy filed a handwritten appeal from behind bars. He called McKoy’s trial attorney, who relayed the information to McKoy in prison. Pearce decided he also had an ethical responsibility to tell McKoy about Talley: “If there is an innocent man in jail, I wanted him to be released.” One officer “gave me the name Lamont McKoy.” Farmelo discusses a bit the question of why Dirac never later. ![]() By 1937, the year he married, Farmelo reports Bohr’s reaction to reading Dirac’s latest paper (on the large numbers hypothesis): Look what happens to people when they get married. “I kept saying, ‘Where is the evidence about this murder?’” Pearce testified. The period of Dirac’s most impressive work was relatively short, ending around 1933. He learned that another man had been convicted in state court in the killing the prosecutor accused Talley of committing - information useful for his client. “I was blown out of the water,” Pearce later testified at McKoy’s first appeal hearing.Īfter the closing argument, Pearce pressed the police officers involved in the case for more information about the killing his client was accused of committing. Talley’s defense attorney, Alexis Pearce, was shocked he had no warning that his drug trafficking client was going to be implicated in a homicide. Talley was ultimately granted a new trial because of the murder accusation and was convicted on drug charges a second time. This text refers to an alternate kindleedition edition. ![]() “Where is the evidence about this murder?” - Alexis Pearce, attorney at appeal hearing The Strangest Man is Graham Farmelo's Costa Biography Award-winning biography of Paul Dirac, the greatest British physicist since Isaac Newton - and one of the strangest geniuses of the twentieth century. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |